Subversion Repositories QNX 8.QNX8 LLVM/Clang compiler suite

//==-- SwiftCallingConv.h - Swift ABI lowering ------------------*- C++ -*-===//

//

// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.

// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.

// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception

//

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

//

// Defines constants and types related to Swift ABI lowering. The same ABI

// lowering applies to both sync and async functions.

//

//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_CODEGEN_SWIFTCALLINGCONV_H

#define LLVM_CLANG_CODEGEN_SWIFTCALLINGCONV_H

#include "clang/AST/CanonicalType.h"

#include "clang/AST/CharUnits.h"

#include "clang/AST/Type.h"

#include "llvm/Support/TrailingObjects.h"

#include <cassert>

namespace llvm {

  class IntegerType;

  class Type;

  class StructType;

  class VectorType;

}

namespace clang {

class FieldDecl;

class ASTRecordLayout;

namespace CodeGen {

class ABIArgInfo;

class CodeGenModule;

class CGFunctionInfo;

namespace swiftcall {

class SwiftAggLowering {

  CodeGenModule &CGM;

  struct StorageEntry {

    CharUnits Begin;

    CharUnits End;

    llvm::Type *Type;

    CharUnits getWidth() const {

      return End - Begin;

    }

  };

  SmallVector<StorageEntry, 4> Entries;

  bool Finished = false;

public:

  SwiftAggLowering(CodeGenModule &CGM) : CGM(CGM) {}

  void addOpaqueData(CharUnits begin, CharUnits end) {

    addEntry(nullptr, begin, end);

  }

  void addTypedData(QualType type, CharUnits begin);

  void addTypedData(const RecordDecl *record, CharUnits begin);

  void addTypedData(const RecordDecl *record, CharUnits begin,

                    const ASTRecordLayout &layout);

  void addTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin);

  void addTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end);

  void finish();

  /// Does this lowering require passing any data?

  bool empty() const {

    assert(Finished && "didn't finish lowering before calling empty()");

    return Entries.empty();

  }

  /// According to the target Swift ABI, should a value with this lowering

  /// be passed indirectly?

  ///

  /// Note that this decision is based purely on the data layout of the

  /// value and does not consider whether the type is address-only,

  /// must be passed indirectly to match a function abstraction pattern, or

  /// anything else that is expected to be handled by high-level lowering.

  ///

  /// \param asReturnValue - if true, answer whether it should be passed

  ///   indirectly as a return value; if false, answer whether it should be

  ///   passed indirectly as an argument

  bool shouldPassIndirectly(bool asReturnValue) const;

  using EnumerationCallback =

    llvm::function_ref<void(CharUnits offset, CharUnits end, llvm::Type *type)>;

  /// Enumerate the expanded components of this type.

  ///

  /// The component types will always be legal vector, floating-point,

  /// integer, or pointer types.

  void enumerateComponents(EnumerationCallback callback) const;

  /// Return the types for a coerce-and-expand operation.

  ///

  /// The first type matches the memory layout of the data that's been

  /// added to this structure, including explicit [N x i8] arrays for any

  /// internal padding.

  ///

  /// The second type removes any internal padding members and, if only

  /// one element remains, is simply that element type.

  std::pair<llvm::StructType*, llvm::Type*> getCoerceAndExpandTypes() const;

private:

  void addBitFieldData(const FieldDecl *field, CharUnits begin,

                       uint64_t bitOffset);

  void addLegalTypedData(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end);

  void addEntry(llvm::Type *type, CharUnits begin, CharUnits end);

  void splitVectorEntry(unsigned index);

  static bool shouldMergeEntries(const StorageEntry &first,

                                 const StorageEntry &second,

                                 CharUnits chunkSize);

};

/// Should an aggregate which expands to the given type sequence

/// be passed/returned indirectly under swiftcall?

bool shouldPassIndirectly(CodeGenModule &CGM,

                          ArrayRef<llvm::Type*> types,

                          bool asReturnValue);

/// Return the maximum voluntary integer size for the current target.

CharUnits getMaximumVoluntaryIntegerSize(CodeGenModule &CGM);

/// Return the Swift CC's notion of the natural alignment of a type.

CharUnits getNaturalAlignment(CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::Type *type);

/// Is the given integer type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the

/// current platform?

bool isLegalIntegerType(CodeGenModule &CGM, llvm::IntegerType *type);

/// Is the given vector type "legal" for Swift's perspective on the

/// current platform?

bool isLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize,

                       llvm::VectorType *vectorTy);

bool isLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize,

                       llvm::Type *eltTy, unsigned numElts);

/// Minimally split a legal vector type.

std::pair<llvm::Type*, unsigned>

splitLegalVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize,

                     llvm::VectorType *vectorTy);

/// Turn a vector type in a sequence of legal component vector types.

///

/// The caller may assume that the sum of the data sizes of the resulting

/// types will equal the data size of the vector type.

void legalizeVectorType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CharUnits vectorSize,

                        llvm::VectorType *vectorTy,

                        llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::Type*> &types);

/// Is the given record type required to be passed and returned indirectly

/// because of language restrictions?

///

/// This considers *only* mandatory indirectness due to language restrictions,

/// such as C++'s non-trivially-copyable types and Objective-C's __weak

/// references.  A record for which this returns true may still be passed

/// indirectly for other reasons, such as being too large to fit in a

/// reasonable number of registers.

bool mustPassRecordIndirectly(CodeGenModule &CGM, const RecordDecl *record);

/// Classify the rules for how to return a particular type.

ABIArgInfo classifyReturnType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type);

/// Classify the rules for how to pass a particular type.

ABIArgInfo classifyArgumentType(CodeGenModule &CGM, CanQualType type);

/// Compute the ABI information of a swiftcall function.  This is a

/// private interface for Clang.

void computeABIInfo(CodeGenModule &CGM, CGFunctionInfo &FI);

/// Is swifterror lowered to a register by the target ABI?

bool isSwiftErrorLoweredInRegister(CodeGenModule &CGM);

} // end namespace swiftcall

} // end namespace CodeGen

} // end namespace clang

#endif